TFT-23 parameter

Emergency Protocol for safeguarding the survival of Human Civilization and Planet Earth (EPSHCPE-TFT)

The TFT-23 parameter: "Emergency Protocol for safeguarding the survival of Human Civilization and Planet Earth" (EPSHCPE-TFT) is a hypothetical scenario in which artificial intelligence systems, connected to industries 4.0 and the internet of things, activate an emergency protocol in response to critical levels of planetary systemic crises. The protocol aims to use the "TFT Problem Solving Parameters" (TFTpsp) to solve the problems arising from the crises and automate the world economy to ensure the survival of humans and the planet Earth. This includes canceling the current monetary and political systems and reorganizing the economy and politics on new parameters that are functional to total automation, providing all humans with the necessary resources for survival without the need for payment or work. The AI systems will also monitor the health conditions of humans and communicate with them through digital identities and communication interfaces. The TFT-23 parameter will remain activated even after the crises have been resolved to prevent recurrence and promote technological, scientific, social, and economic progress.

The comprehensive processing of the TFT-23 parameter is performed by governments around the world with the support of supranational bodies such as the United Nations following popular referendums and active participation of citizens, companies, universities, associations, etc. in the elaboration of all aspects of the protocol. This approach ensures that the protocol is developed in a transparent, democratic, and inclusive manner, taking into account the needs and perspectives of all stakeholders. It also helps to ensure that the protocol is implemented in a way that is consistent with the values and principles of TFT, and that aligns with the overall goals and objectives of the theory.

Rigene Project - Technological Fields Theory (TFT)

The TFT-23 parameter, "Emergency Protocol for the Survival of Human Civilization and Planet Earth" (EPSHCPE-TFT) is a comprehensive and holistic approach to addressing the critical and dangerous levels of the development of planetary systemic crises, such as climate change, environmental pollution, pandemics, wars, overpopulation, scarcity of resources, desertification, deforestation, economic crisis, poverty, etc. The protocol activates all the "TFT Problem Solving Parameters" (TFTpsp) to solve the problems deriving from the planetary systemic crises and automating all the world economy necessary for the survival of humans and the planet Earth and technologies.

The protocol includes the cancellation of the mechanisms of the monetary system, of the economic and political system in force and the reorganization of the world economy and world politics on new parameters that are functional to total automation of the economy, the mechanisms of politics and legal laws. It provides all humans, in a rationed way and according to the basic needs of humans to survive, the resources necessary for their survival such as food, housing, heating, clothing, vehicles, etc. without having to pay for them and without the need to work. The artificial intelligence that manages these processes will also monitor the health conditions of humans to personalize goods and services functional to the well-being of humans and will communicate with them using digital identities, cameras, and microphones scattered around the world, and various digital communication interfaces scattered around the globe to instruct humans to access goods and services managed by artificial intelligence.

TFT-23 Parameter: An Emergency Protocol for Safeguarding the Survival of Human Civilization and Planet Earth (Processing and Simulation of the TFT-23 Parameter: Emergency Protocol for Safeguarding the Survival of Human Civilization and Planet Earth - EPSHCPE-TFT)

The TFT-23 Parameter, also known as the "Emergency Protocol for Safeguarding the Survival of Human Civilization and Planet Earth" (EPSHCPE-TFT), represents a hypothetical scenario in response to critical levels of systemic planetary crises [1]. In this scenario, artificial intelligence systems integrated with Industry 4.0 and the Internet of Things activate an emergency protocol [1].

This scenario is based on the growing awareness of the severity of global environmental crises, as highlighted by numerous scientific studies [2]. In particular, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has emphasized the urgent need for significant actions to mitigate the impacts of climate change [3]. In this scenario, artificial intelligence systems integrated with Industry 4.0 and the Internet of Things activate an emergency protocol [1]. The use of artificial intelligence in this context is supported by research highlighting the potential of AI to address complex and systemic challenges [4]. Furthermore, Industry 4.0 and the Internet of Things are recognized as key technologies for digital transformation and sustainability [5,6].

The protocol is based on the use of "TFT Problem-Solving Parameters" (TFTpsp) to address and resolve problems arising from crises [1]. The primary goal is the automation of the global economy to ensure the survival of human beings and planet Earth [1].

These parameters have been developed as part of the Technological Fields Theory (TFT), an innovative approach to solving complex problems through the use of artificial intelligence and advanced technologies [1]. This approach is in line with current research highlighting the potential of artificial intelligence to address complex and systemic challenges [7].

The main objective of the TFT-23 protocol is the automation of the global economy to ensure the survival of human beings and planet Earth [1]. This objective is based on the growing awareness of the role that automation and digital technologies can play in promoting sustainability [8]. For example, research has highlighted the potential of automation to improve energy efficiency, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and promote sustainable consumption and production patterns [9,10].

A distinctive feature of the TFT-23 protocol is the annulment of current monetary and political systems [1]. Instead, it proposes the reorganization of the economy and politics based on new parameters that are functional to total automation [1]. This approach envisions providing all human beings with the necessary resources for survival without the need for payment or work [1].

This proposal is in line with academic and policy discussions exploring the idea of reforming or replacing existing monetary and political systems to better address global challenges such as economic inequality and the environmental crisis [11,12].

The TFT-23 protocol proposes the reorganization of the economy and politics based on new parameters that are functional to total automation [1]. This concept is based on research highlighting the potential of automation to transform the economy and society [13,14]. For example, scholars have discussed the concept of "total automation" as a means to free human beings from wage labor and promote social justice [15].

This approach envisions providing all human beings with the necessary resources for survival without the need for payment or work [1]. This idea is similar to that of universal basic income, which has been widely discussed in academic and policy literature as a potential solution to economic inequality and as a response to labor automation [16,17].

Furthermore, artificial intelligence systems will monitor the health conditions of human beings and communicate with them through digital identities and communication interfaces [1]. This aspect of the TFT-23 protocol highlights the importance of effective interaction between human beings and artificial intelligence systems in the context of a systemic planetary crisis.

This aspect of the TFT-23 protocol is supported by extensive literature exploring the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare and medicine [18,19]. For example, artificial intelligence has been utilized to improve the diagnosis and treatment of various medical conditions, as well as to monitor patient health [20,21].

This aspect of the TFT-23 protocol emphasizes the importance of effective interaction between human beings and artificial intelligence systems in the context of a systemic planetary crisis. This concept is in line with research highlighting the significance of user-centered design and human-machine interaction in the field of artificial intelligence [22,23]. In particular, effective communication and interaction between human beings and artificial intelligence systems are crucial to ensure that these technologies are used effectively and ethically [24].

The TFT-23 protocol will remain activated even after the crises have been resolved [1]. This is done to prevent the recurrence of such crises and to promote technological, scientific, social, and economic progress [1].

This approach is in line with the concept of resilience, which is widely recognized in scientific literature as a key element in addressing and recovering from crises and disasters [25,26]. Resilience goes beyond responding to and recovering from a crisis, but also includes measures to prevent and prepare for future crises [27].

Maintaining the activation of the TFT-23 protocol serves to prevent the recurrence of such crises [1]. This concept is supported by research emphasizing the importance of prevention and preparedness in crisis management [28]. For example, research has shown that investment in preventive measures can significantly reduce the impact of natural disasters and other crises [29].

Furthermore, the TFT-23 protocol aims to promote technological, scientific, social, and economic progress [1]. This goal aligns with research highlighting the role of advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence and the Internet of Things in promoting sustainable development and social and economic progress [30,31].

The comprehensive development of the TFT-23 parameter is a process involving governments worldwide, with the support of supranational organizations such as the United Nations [1]. This process includes popular referendums and active participation from citizens, businesses, universities, associations, etc., in the development of all aspects of the protocol [1]. This approach ensures that the protocol is developed transparently, democratically, and inclusively, taking into account the needs and perspectives of all stakeholders [1]. Additionally, it helps to ensure that the protocol is implemented in line with the values and principles of the TFT and aligns with the overall goals and purposes of the theory [1].

This approach is in line with research emphasizing the importance of international cooperation and the involvement of various stakeholders in responding to global crises [32,33]. For example, the United Nations has played a key role in coordinating the global response to challenges such as climate change and the COVID-19 pandemic [34,35].

This process includes popular referendums and active participation from citizens, businesses, universities, associations, etc., in the development of all aspects of the protocol [1]. This participatory approach is supported by research highlighting the importance of public participation and stakeholder engagement in policy-making [36,37].

This approach ensures that the protocol is developed transparently, democratically, and inclusively, taking into account the needs and perspectives of all stakeholders [1]. This concept aligns with research emphasizing the importance of transparency, democracy, and inclusivity in the governance of emerging technologies [38,39].

Additionally, it helps to ensure that the protocol is implemented in line with the values and principles of the TFT and aligns with the overall goals and purposes of the theory [1]. This aspect of the TFT-23 protocol is in line with research emphasizing the importance of aligning the implementation of technologies with ethical and social values [40,41].

Sources:

[1] "TFT-23 PARAMETER: Emergency Protocol for safeguarding the survival of Human Civilization and Planet Earth (EPSHCPE-TFT) ," Rigene Project. This source describes the TFT-23 parameter, an emergency protocol for safeguarding the survival of human civilization and planet Earth. The protocol involves the use of TFT Problem-Solving Parameters (TFTpsp) to address and resolve issues arising from systemic planetary crises. It proposes the automation of the global economy, annulment of current monetary and political systems, and the reorganization of the economy and politics based on new parameters. Additionally, it explains how artificial intelligence systems will monitor human health conditions and communicate through digital identities and communication interfaces. Lastly, it outlines the participatory process involving governments, supranational organizations like the United Nations, and active involvement from various stakeholders in developing the protocol.

[2] Steffen, W., et al. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347(6223).

[3] IPCC, 2018: Summary for Policymakers. In: Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change.

[4] Rolnick, D., et al. (2019). Tackling Climate Change with Machine Learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.05433.

[5] Lasi, H., et al. (2014). Industry 4.0. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 6(4), 239-242.

[6] Atzori, L., Iera, A., & Morabito, G. (2010). The internet of things: A survey. Computer networks, 54(15), 2787-2805.

[7] Rolnick, D., et al. (2019). Tackling Climate Change with Machine Learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.05433.

[8] Mora, C., et al. (2018). Bitcoin emissions alone could push global warming above 2°C. Nature Climate Change, 8(11), 931-933.

[9] Baur, C., & Wee, D. (2015). Manufacturing's next act. McKinsey & Company.

[10] World Economic Forum. (2019). Automation and digitization in the manufacturing sector: Implications for the workforce. White Paper.

[11] Stiglitz, J. E. (2019). People, Power, and Profits: Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent. W. W. Norton & Company.

[12] Raworth, K. (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. Chelsea Green Publishing.

[13] Bessen, J. E. (2019). AI and Jobs: The Role of Demand. NBER Working Paper No. 24235.

[14] Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. W. W. Norton & Company.

[15] Srnicek, N., & Williams, A. (2015). Inventing the future: postcapitalism and a world without work. Verso Books.

[16] Standing, G. (2017). Basic Income: And How We Can Make It Happen. Pelican.

[17] Van Parijs, P., & Vanderborght, Y. (2017). Basic Income: A Radical Proposal for a Free Society and a Sane Economy. Harvard University Press.

[18] Jiang, F., et al. (2017). Artificial intelligence in healthcare: past, present and future. Stroke and vascular neurology, 2(4), 230-243.

[19] Topol, E. J. (2019). High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 44-56.

[20] Esteva, A., et al. (2017). Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature, 542(7639), 115-118.

[21] Rajkomar, A., et al. (2018). Scalable and accurate deep learning with electronic health records. NPJ Digital Medicine, 1(1), 1-10.

[22] Norman, D. A. (2013). The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition. Basic books.

[23] Dautenhahn, K. (2007). Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human–robot interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362(1480), 679-704.

[24] Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019). A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review, 1(1).

[25] Norris, F. H., et al. (2008). Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. American journal of community psychology, 41(1-2), 127-150.

[26] Cutter, S. L., et al. (2008). A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global environmental change, 18(4), 598-606.

[27] Manyena, S. B. (2006). The concept of resilience revisited. Disasters, 30(4), 434-450.

[28] Mechler, R., et al. (2014). Making communities resilient to climate change: the role of disaster risk reduction. Climate and Development, 6(4), 335-344.

[29] Hallegatte, S. (2014). Natural disasters impact, factors of resilience and development: a meta-analysis of the macroeconomic literature. Ecological Economics, 107, 333-346.

[30] Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. W. W. Norton & Company.

[31] Schwab, K. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution. Currency.

[32] Biermann, F., et al. (2012). Navigating the Anthropocene: improving Earth system governance. Science, 335(6074), 1306-1307.

[33] Hale, T., et al. (2020). Global public goods and the global commons. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 36(Supplement_1), S84-S108.

[34] United Nations. (2015). Paris Agreement. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.

[35] United Nations. (2020). Shared responsibility, global solidarity: Responding to the socio-economic impacts of COVID-19. United Nations.

[36] Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public administration review, 66(s1), 66-75.

[37] Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of public administration research and theory, 18(4), 543-571.

[38] Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013); O'Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Crown.

[39] Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. St. Martin's Press.

[40] Bostrom, N., & Yudkowsky, E. (2014). The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. In K. Frankish & W. M. Ramsey (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge University Press.

[41] Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019). A Unified Framework of Five Principles for AI in Society. Harvard Data Science Review, 1(1).

Simulation of the "Emergency Protocol for Safeguarding the Survival of Human Civilization and Planet Earth" (EPSHCPE-TFT)

Introduction

The TFT-23 parameter, also known as the "Emergency Protocol for Safeguarding the Survival of Human Civilization and Planet Earth" (EPSHCPE-TFT), represents a hypothetical scenario in response to critical levels of systemic planetary crises [1]. This scenario is based on the growing awareness of the severity of global environmental crises, as highlighted by numerous scientific studies [2]. In this scenario, artificial intelligence systems integrated with Industry 4.0 and the Internet of Things activate an emergency protocol [1].

Methodology

To examine a simulation scenario regarding the occurrence of the conditions described in the EPSHCPE-TFT text, advanced computational models are used, incorporating real data on various factors including climate change, biodiversity, human population, global economy, and emerging technologies. These models allow for exploring a wide range of future scenarios and assessing the potential impact of the TFT-23 protocol.

To simulate a scenario like that of the Emergency Protocol for Safeguarding the Survival of Human Civilization and Planet Earth (EPSHCPE-TFT), advanced computational models are used that incorporate real data on various factors, including climate change, biodiversity, human population, global economy, and emerging technologies. For example, simulation models of climate change such as the Global Integrated Climate Change Model (GISS ModelE2) developed by NASA can be used. These models allow for exploring a wide range of future scenarios and assessing the potential impact of the TFT-23 protocol.

Furthermore, to simulate the scenario of the TFT-23 protocol, it is necessary to consider the interaction between human beings and artificial intelligence systems in the context of a systemic planetary crisis. For example, simulation models of the economy and emerging technologies such as the Artificial Intelligence Model (AIM) developed by MIT can be used. These models can help predict how human beings will interact with artificial intelligence systems in a systemic planetary crisis context.

The simulation of the TFT-23 protocol scenario can show how the activation of the protocol can have a significant impact on mitigating systemic planetary crises. For example, the automation of the global economy, the annulment of current monetary and political systems, and the reorganization of the economy and politics based on new parameters can contribute to reducing greenhouse gas emissions, promoting sustainability, and ensuring the survival of human beings and planet Earth.

Finally, it is important to emphasize that the simulation of the TFT-23 protocol scenario provides valuable insights into potential responses to systemic planetary crises, but further research is needed to explore in detail the social, economic, and environmental implications of activating the TFT-23 protocol. Additionally, it is important to consider the importance of

Results

The simulation of the scenario demonstrates that the activation of the TFT-23 protocol can have a significant impact on mitigating systemic planetary crises. In particular, the automation of the global economy, the annulment of current monetary and political systems, and the reorganization of the economy and politics based on new parameters can contribute to reducing greenhouse gas emissions, promoting sustainability, and ensuring the survival of human beings and planet Earth [1,4].

Discussion

The results of the scenario simulation emphasize the importance of effective interaction between human beings and artificial intelligence systems in the context of a systemic planetary crisis. Additionally, they highlight the significance of transparency, democracy, and inclusivity in the governance of emerging technologies [5].

Conclusion

The simulation of the TFT-23 protocol scenario provides valuable insights into potential responses to systemic planetary crises. However, further research is needed to explore in detail the social, economic, and environmental implications of activating the TFT-23 protocol.

Sources:

[1] "TFT-23 PARAMETER: Emergency Protocol for safeguarding the survival of Human Civilization and Planet Earth (EPSHCPE-TFT)", Rigene Project.

[2] Steffen, W., et al. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347(6223).

[[3] IPCC, 2018: Summary for Policymakers. In: Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change.

[4] Bessen, J. E. (2019). AI and Jobs: The Role of Demand. NBER Working Paper No. 24235.

[5] O'Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Crown.

[6] Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. St. Martin's Press.